dc.description.abstract |
One fine Tuesday evening I realized, months after walking between the metro
station to my house after work, I always take the longer route. The gali
(tertiary road) which directly connected the station to my house had a heavy
canopy of trees, casting unintentional shadows from the dimly lit yellow
halogen lamps. It also had a chai tapir at the junction with an illegally sprung
up alcohol shop. Subconsciously, hundreds of other women, like me, found
nothing unusual in taking the longer, ‘safer’ road back home each day. And
that was the root and inception of the idea of studying the urban realm to
understand how our cities can be planned better- more equitably - to create
an environment which is inclusive for all genders.
“Cities are designed by men for men”, Leslie Kern said in her book feminist
city. And indeed, our cities are gendered at multi-scalar levels ranging from
inside the house to the urban realm. Cities have been gendered before the
advent of modern planning, where European cities were planned by planners,
engineers, and architects – most of them men. With the vast colonialization,
this spread throughout the world. With time, and pioneering ideas of Dolores
Hayden, Jane Jacobs, Elizabeth Wood, the subtle yet prominent links
between patriarchy and spatiality in urban realm were knit together and the
injustice of the ‘right to the city’ by women was established. Furthermore,
with Lefebvre’s and Soja’s theories of space, it was reinforced that spaces is
an embodied experience of the innocent space and the societal conditioning
on it. This gave rise to observation of gendered spaces in the city. Mappings
in the past decade in India by Shilpa Phadke (Mumbai) and other organization
like Safetipin, Jagori have been working relentlessly in this field.
“It’s not safe for women to be our at night”. “Don’t loiter in parks / streets
without purpose”, “Don’t go alone” are some of the common statements
women of diverse socio-economic backgrounds hear each day. According to
a study in India, 57.4% crimes against women occur outside homes – which
makes it a crucial urban design concern. Equal participation and access of
women in cities cannot be seen as a standalone issue, and needs to be
addressed at its roots. This way the solutions suggested won’t act merely as
a bandage to the problem. The primary motive of the study is to zoom out,
and associate women in the urban realm with INCLUSION, not just safety.
The hypothesis of thesis states that inclusion is a precursor to safety, and if
the places are inclusive to women, they will automatically be safe. The study
delves into defining scope and understanding of ‘inclusion’ regarding women
in a precinct in Delhi. This involves understanding the reasons of patterns of
their movement (and lack of movement) and how the experience can be
made more inclusive through interjections in the existing fabric, whilst
proposing the future developments. |
en_US |