Abstract:
“The environmental load of the exponentially growing economy, driven by the
consumption of the growing population is leading to distribution conflicts. Evidence
suggests that the societies that have least contributed to climate change suffer the
most from it due to lacking capacities and capital to act on the hazards and effects
of climate change and on the contrary, the ones’ who contribute the most towards
climate change have better capacity of dealing with the same, resulting in social
inequity and environmental injustice. The research focuses on climate equity that
relates to addressing environmental justice and social equity concerns. In order to
primarily allocate and achieve equitable distribution of resources amongst
communities and further assess the vulnerability that will help identify the
communities of concern, there is a need to establish a climate equity assessment
and bring in public participation.
The focus of the aim is localising of the “SDG 11 [Make cities and human
settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable]” as a way to address climate
equity in planning by utilization of non-traditional data source i.e. Citizen Science
to map vulnerabilities as well as decision making. Four objectives are formulated,
that define three phases of the research elaborated to form the methodology. The
scope of the research is to mainstream information, knowledge and data sets coproduced through citizen science for mapping of vulnerable communities formed
by underlying equities into planning, while strengthening local institutional [formal
and informal] capacity to address equity concerns and differential vulnerability.
The “Sustainable Development Goals” have the most comprehensive set of
indicators relating to climate equity concerns. The SDG India Index developed by
NITI Aayog, focuses on implementing the SDGs across the country and measuring
the status of the SDGs at the state level. However, localising the SDGs is essential
to combat climate change and build resilience. The roadmap for localizing SDGs
provided by UN highlights the importance for public participation and democratic
accountability as it is a tool to drive the localisation of the SDGs. By mobilizing and
integrating citizen science, stakeholder and communities, the essential mapping of
vulnerable communities can be achieved, and foster monitoring progress of SDGs. Conventional data sources are insufficient for evaluating the implementation and
monitoring of the SDGs; innovative and non-conventional sources of data are
required for it. Citizen science is an emerging method of a non-conventional data
source, integrated with climate equity to achieve inclusive development in the
domain of planning can be explored for better decision making and good planning
practices.
To address climate equity, a comprehensive set of indicators for local action is
required using mixed qualitative (participatory) and quantitative (modelling)
methods for mapping vulnerabilities and develop a robust adaptive capacity. For
this, a contributory framework of citizen science would be essential for inclusive
development.
With the focus of equity, society and climate, certain indicators were chosen for
the assessment which are physical vulnerability, social vulnerability and status of
SDG 11 targets. The vulnerability forms the needs assessment with additional SDG
11 targets to be achieved at the local level. It was developed that achieving the
SDG 11 targets essentially related to addressing equity in the cities.
Through primary data collection in the form of online and field surveys and
secondary data collection; the assessment is conducted in two phases. The
selection of the study area is based on the SDG India Index scores and tier 1 and
tier 2 cities. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation was selected as the study area
and the assessment was conducted.
The outcome of this research is to suggest a framework for monitoring and
implementation essentially translating to localization of SDGs and a citizen science
framework with knowledge transfer and collaborative platforms as a way to address
climate equity concerns in planning. Furthermore, building capacities of the formal
and informal institutions, governance convergence, and provide spatial strategies
for adaptation towards the impacts of climate change. Along with the conventional
planning process, the assessment would contribute as a layer to address problems
and make priority decisions based on the findings of the assessment. This would
translate into suggesting strategies including spatial design, resource allocation,
and policy measures at the local level for formal and informal institutional capacity
building for the selected study area.